Interactive Health Communication for longer, better lives.

MGUS: not so benign after all

Evidence that MGUS is a risk factor for the development of DVT.

Article Type: Diagnosis
Author: Michael J. Kovacs
Publication Date: Vol. 112 SEARCH: Advanced Current Issue First Edition Archives Submit to Blood Search American Society of Hematology Meeting Abstracts Email Alerts Blood pp. 3533. No. 9 1 November 2008
Source: Blood
Source Type: Website

It is well appreciated that persons with multiple myeloma have an increased risk of venous thrombosis. More recently, this relative risk has been shown to be increased further in these patients while on therapy with thalidomide and its derivatives. The mechanism of this increased risk for thrombosis has traditionally been attributed to traditional neoplasia risks for thrombosis, such as decreased mobility, surgical procedures, use of chemotherapy, and/or indwelling catheters. In this study, Kristinsson et al reviewed 4 196 197 veterans who were hospitalized at least once at Veteran Affairs hospitals in the United States and identified a total of 2374 patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and 6192 multiple myeloma patients. In the whole study population, there were 39 272 persons with a deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with totals of 31 and 151 occurring among MGUS and multiple myeloma patients, respectively. Compared with the whole study population, the relative risk of DVT following a diagnosis of MGUS and multiple myeloma was 3.3 (2.3-4.7) and 9.2 (7.9-10.8), respectively. As the authors point out, it is important to realize that these data were gathered prior to the current prevalent use of thalidomide in myeloma patients.

These results have important implications. The fact that patients with MGUS have an increased risk of DVT together with the known risk of transformation to multiple myeloma suggests there may be a common underlying mechanism or etiology to the 2 conditions that is independent of cancer treatment.

Limitations of this study include the obvious facts that it is retrospective and the diagnoses are determined only by the discharge diagnostic codes. Due to the difficulty of separating patients with pulmonary embolism from other respiratory conditions, patients with isolated pulmonary embolism were not identified and so we don't know if there is an increased risk for that. Nonetheless, this study should point the way to identifying the underlying pathogenesis of DVT in patients with plasma cell dysplasia and may ultimately help to identify those patients who should have thromboprophylaxis.

Footnotes

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The author declares no competing financial interests. {blacksquare}


Add to CiteULike CiteULike Add to Connotea Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us Add to Digg Digg Add to Reddit Reddit Add to Technorati Technorati What's this?

Related Article in Blood Online:


Deep vein thrombosis after monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma
Sigurdur Y. Kristinsson, Thomas R. Fears, Gloria Gridley, Ingemar Turesson, Ulf-Henrik Mellqvist, Magnus Björkholm, and Ola Landgren
Blood 2008 112: 3582-3586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
Please type in these five (5) letters or numbers to verify you aren't a SPAM Bot!
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.